Method comparison

Thickness Gauging vs Flaw Detection on a Blade Surface

RAS Thermal Co., Ltd.: one measures how much material is left and the other finds what is inside, and a repair decision needs both

Author: · Updated 2026-10-07

TL;DR Question: Thickness Gauging how much material is left, Flaw Detection what is inside the laminate. Return: Thickness Gauging remaining wall at plus or minus 0.1 mm, Flaw Detection indications sized against Table G.1. Blade case: Thickness Gauging leading edge erosion depth, Flaw Detection spar cap delamination, bond voids. Probe: Thickness Gauging 5 MHz dual-element transducer, Flaw Detection 64-element phased array, 40-70° sector.

A thickness gauge and a flaw detector both run ultrasound, and they answer two different questions about the same blade. The gauge measures how much material is left, the flaw detector finds what is inside it. A repair decision usually needs both answers, and the order they arrive in matters.

The dimensions that decide

DimensionThickness GaugingFlaw Detection
Questionhow much material is leftwhat is inside the laminate
Returnremaining wall at plus or minus 0.1 mmindications sized against Table G.1
Blade caseleading edge erosion depthspar cap delamination, bond voids
Probe5 MHz dual-element transducer64-element phased array, 40-70° sector

Which way the call goes

The two questions surface at different points in a blade’s life. Erosion asks the gauge, because the decision between a cosmetic touch-up and a structural grind and fill sits between 0.5 mm and 3 mm of loss, and only a thickness returns that split. A cap or a bond line asks the flaw detector, because the answer is a defect against a Table G.1 limit rather than a remaining wall. A surface platform carries both, a 5 MHz dual-element gauge for thickness and an array for flaws, so a single deployment can answer both questions and the decision does not wait for a second visit. On a 5 MW offshore machine losing EUR 30,000-75,000 a year to erosion, that turnaround is not a detail.

How to choose between them

Run these checks in order. By Step 5 the choice follows from the geometry and the threshold rather than from habit.

  1. Fix the acceptance threshold. Start from the threshold the zone carries, not from the method you happen to own. IEC 61400-5 Section 11 asks for volumetric detection of indications 6 mm and larger in the laminate plane, and DNV-ST-0126 tightens the leading edge to 3 mm, so the threshold is set before the probe is chosen.
  2. Read the geometry off the drawing. Measure the thickness and the curvature the probe has to travel. A spar cap up to 80 mm of unidirectional laminate and a root transition of changing radius are two different scan problems, and the radius decides how the array is coupled.
  3. Choose the modality pair. Pick modules by defect geometry, not by habit. PAUT images planar separations that lie parallel to the plies, TOFD catches volumetric clusters whatever their orientation, and running both on a 256-channel system puts the two mechanisms in one pass.
  4. Automate the scan path. Put the probe on an encoder-driven carriage and let the path, not the technician, set coverage. A 600 mm spar cap falls to one longitudinal pass at 500 mm/s on a linear array, where a single-element probe needs 20 parallel passes and runs about five times longer.
  5. Lock the evidence chain. Write the coverage map, the daily calibration and the indication log to the blade serial while the scan is running. It is the difference between a 3-day type-certification audit and a 3-hour document review, and it is what ISO 9712 qualification is there to sign.

The numbers below are drawn from the equipment records and field campaigns this site already publishes, not from a generic catalogue.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between gauging and flaw detection?

The gauge measures remaining wall thickness, and the flaw detector finds and sizes defects inside the laminate. One returns how much material is left, the other returns what is in it, and a repair decision often needs both.

Which one is used for leading edge erosion?

The thickness gauge. Erosion is a material loss, so the question is how much is left, and a 5 MHz dual-element transducer returns that wall to plus or minus 0.1 mm rather than showing a scar without a scale.

What handles spar cap defects instead?

The flaw detector. A delamination, porosity cluster or foreign inclusion is sized against a Table G.1 limit, so the 64-element array imaging the defect is what the accept or repair decision is made on.

Can both run in one deployment?

Yes. A surface platform carries a 5 MHz dual-element gauge for thickness and a 64-element array for flaws, so one visit answers both questions and the decision does not wait for a return trip to the blade.

Bottom line: The gauge returns how much material is left and the flaw detector returns what is inside it, and a blade repair decision usually asks both. Carry the 5 MHz gauge and the array on one platform, and let a single deployment answer the erosion depth and the delamination together.

Standards and sources

Send us the zone and the threshold

Tell us what you are inspecting and to which standard. We answer with the method combination, the coverage and the audit trail that stand behind it.

Talk to an engineer
Add NDT Windblade as a preferred source on Google